| Go to problem: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 |
If we list all the natural numbers below 10 that are multiples of 3 or 5, we get 3, 5, 6 and 9. The sum of these multiples is 23.
Find the sum of all the multiples of 3 or 5 below 1000.
Solving this requires a simple while loop containing a conditional to check divisibility, summing if appropriate. Note the use of _ for the current loop index (starting from 1), and, unlike C for example, the logical or operator is a single bar.

Each new term in the Fibonacci sequence is generated by adding the previous two terms. By starting with 1 and 2, the first 10 terms will be:
1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, ...
By considering the terms in the Fibonacci sequence whose values do not exceed four million, find the sum of the even-valued terms.
Here we have another conditional sum, though this time calculating Fibonacci numbers as we go and checking an exit condition, rather than using a fixed loop count.

The prime factors of 13195 are 5, 7, 13 and 29.
What is the largest prime factor of the number 600851475143 ?
Range returns the minimum and maximum values in an array. Select the 2nd entry for the maximum.

A palindromic number reads the same both ways. The largest palindrome made from the product of two 2-digit numbers is 9009 = 91
99.
Find the largest palindrome made from the product of two 3-digit numbers.
First we need a function to check if a string is a palindrome. The ispalin function does this by comparing a copy of the input string
(created by the unary + operator) with the reverse of the string (Rev reverses in place).
Note a single = for the logical equality test.
Next use nested while loops to multiply all numbers greater than 900 and check if we have a palindrome. Given a solution is found there is no need to check smaller numbers.

2520 is the smallest number that can be divided by each of the numbers from 1 to 10 without any remainder.
What is the smallest positive number that is evenly divisible by all of the numbers from 1 to 20?
To solve this problem we need the prime numbers less than 20, so loop to calculate them, building up the array p.
Then create an equally sized array c which will store the required power for each of these primes, and initialise it with zeros.
Also define an update function that will check each entry of its two input arrays, and update the second array to have
the largest value at each index.
Now we can work out the required power for each prime by factorising each integer to 20,
counting the frequency of each factor and passing the result and the running count in c to the
update function.
Finally raise our array of primes to the powers in c and multiply to get the answer. Check by calculating the remainder
when dividing by each of the integers from 1 to 20.

The sum of the squares of the first ten natural numbers is,
The square of the sum of the first ten natural numbers is,
Hence the difference between the sum of the squares of the first ten natural numbers and the square of the sum is 3025
385 = 2640.
Find the difference between the sum of the squares of the first one hundred natural numbers and the square of the sum.
This problem is trivially solved by looping, directly calculating the two sums and taking the difference.

By listing the first six prime numbers: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13, we can see that the 6th prime is 13.
What is the 10 001st prime number?
Another straightforward problem. We simply loop checking each odd number for primality and stopping when we have found the 10 001st prime.

Find the greatest product of five consecutive digits in the 1000-digit number.
73167176531330624919225119674426574742355349194934
96983520312774506326239578318016984801869478851843
85861560789112949495459501737958331952853208805511
12540698747158523863050715693290963295227443043557
66896648950445244523161731856403098711121722383113
62229893423380308135336276614282806444486645238749
30358907296290491560440772390713810515859307960866
70172427121883998797908792274921901699720888093776
65727333001053367881220235421809751254540594752243
52584907711670556013604839586446706324415722155397
53697817977846174064955149290862569321978468622482
83972241375657056057490261407972968652414535100474
82166370484403199890008895243450658541227588666881
16427171479924442928230863465674813919123162824586
17866458359124566529476545682848912883142607690042
24219022671055626321111109370544217506941658960408
07198403850962455444362981230987879927244284909188
84580156166097919133875499200524063689912560717606
05886116467109405077541002256983155200055935729725
71636269561882670428252483600823257530420752963450
To solve this problem we define the mul5 function to multiply the digits of a number of five or more digits.
This function uses integer division operator /% to drop the least significant digit each iteration of the loop,
and finishes with a lone p as return value.
Given this function, we can then work through the 1000-digit number provided 5 digits at a time, saving the maximum product found.

A Pythagorean triplet is a set of three natural numbers, a
b
c, for which,
For example, 32 + 42 = 9 + 16 = 25 = 52.
There exists exactly one Pythagorean triplet for which a + b + c = 1000.
Find the product abc.
To solve this problem we use nested loops to construct all sets of three integers a<b<c
such that a+b+c=1000, and print any that form a Pythagorean triad, along with their product.

The sum of the primes below 10 is 2 + 3 + 5 + 7 = 17.
Find the sum of all the primes below two million.
The solution to this problem is just a straightforward loop, prime check and sum.

In the 20
20 grid below, four numbers along a diagonal line have been marked in red.
08 02 22 97 38 15 00 40 00 75 04 05 07 78 52 12 50 77 91 08
49 49 99 40 17 81 18 57 60 87 17 40 98 43 69 48 04 56 62 00
81 49 31 73 55 79 14 29 93 71 40 67 53 88 30 03 49 13 36 65
52 70 95 23 04 60 11 42 69 24 68 56 01 32 56 71 37 02 36 91
22 31 16 71 51 67 63 89 41 92 36 54 22 40 40 28 66 33 13 80
24 47 32 60 99 03 45 02 44 75 33 53 78 36 84 20 35 17 12 50
32 98 81 28 64 23 67 10 26 38 40 67 59 54 70 66 18 38 64 70
67 26 20 68 02 62 12 20 95 63 94 39 63 08 40 91 66 49 94 21
24 55 58 05 66 73 99 26 97 17 78 78 96 83 14 88 34 89 63 72
21 36 23 09 75 00 76 44 20 45 35 14 00 61 33 97 34 31 33 95
78 17 53 28 22 75 31 67 15 94 03 80 04 62 16 14 09 53 56 92
16 39 05 42 96 35 31 47 55 58 88 24 00 17 54 24 36 29 85 57
86 56 00 48 35 71 89 07 05 44 44 37 44 60 21 58 51 54 17 58
19 80 81 68 05 94 47 69 28 73 92 13 86 52 17 77 04 89 55 40
04 52 08 83 97 35 99 16 07 97 57 32 16 26 26 79 33 27 98 66
88 36 68 87 57 62 20 72 03 46 33 67 46 55 12 32 63 93 53 69
04 42 16 73 38 25 39 11 24 94 72 18 08 46 29 32 40 62 76 36
20 69 36 41 72 30 23 88 34 62 99 69 82 67 59 85 74 04 36 16
20 73 35 29 78 31 90 01 74 31 49 71 48 86 81 16 23 57 05 54
01 70 54 71 83 51 54 69 16 92 33 48 61 43 52 01 89 19 67 48
The product of these numbers is 26
63
78
14 = 1788696.
What is the greatest product of four adjacent numbers in any direction (up, down, left, right, or diagonally) in the 20
20 grid?
First we need to enter the values for the grid and partition into a 20x20 matrix. Then define functions that given a starting position will calculate the across, down and two diagonal products respectively. Then it is just a matter of applying these functions with all legal starting positions and determining the maximum result.

The sequence of triangle numbers is generated by adding the natural numbers. So the 7th triangle number would be 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 = 28. The first ten terms would be:
1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, 55, ...
Let us list the factors of the first seven triangle numbers:
1: 1
3: 1,3
6: 1,2,3,6
10: 1,2,5,10
15: 1,3,5,15
21: 1,3,7,21
28: 1,2,4,7,14,28
We can see that 28 is the first triangle number to have over five divisors.
What is the value of the first triangle number to have over five hundred divisors?
The number of positive divisors of an integer is the product of 1 greater than each power in its prime factorisation. Using this, we can loop and generate each triangular number, calculate the number of factors, and finish when there are more than 500.

Work out the first ten digits of the sum of the following one-hundred 50-digit numbers.
Just add the numbers directly then do an integer division.

...

The following iterative sequence is defined for the set of positive integers:
n
n/2 (n is even)
n
3n + 1 (n is odd)
Using the rule above and starting with 13, we generate the following sequence:
It can be seen that this sequence (starting at 13 and finishing at 1) contains 10 terms. Although it has not been proved yet (Collatz Problem), it is thought that all starting numbers finish at 1.
Which starting number, under one million, produces the longest chain?
NOTE: Once the chain starts the terms are allowed to go above one million.
For a first attempt, we define functions for evaluating the Collatz sequence, and then check all starting values up to 1 million. Evaluating the nested loops is quite slow in the interpreter and this takes several minutes to complete.

Avoiding functions entirely improves the speed by about one third, but this remains unacceptably slow.

Maintaining a history of chain lengths improves the performance considerably.

...

Starting in the top left corner of a 2
2 grid, there are 6 routes (without backtracking) to the bottom right corner.
How many routes are there through a 20
20 grid?
This problem reduces to simply counting the number of ways to choose 20 right turns from 40 possibilities

215 = 32768 and the sum of its digits is 3 + 2 + 7 + 6 + 8 = 26.
What is the sum of the digits of the number 21000?
Simply calculate the power and sum the digits.

If the numbers 1 to 5 are written out in words: one, two, three, four, five, then there are 3 + 3 + 5 + 4 + 4 = 19 letters used in total.
If all the numbers from 1 to 1000 (one thousand) inclusive were written out in words, how many letters would be used?
NOTE: Do not count spaces or hyphens. For example, 342 (three hundred and forty-two) contains 23 letters and 115 (one hundred and fifteen) contains 20 letters. The use of "and" when writing out numbers is in compliance with British usage.
A nice start to solving this problem is to do the conversion to word form.
First define the words in a couple of arrays, select them appropriately and join using the :: operator.
Note the copy operation (unary +) because join works in place.

Now try some test values.

To calculate the solution to the problem we use a similar technique, but instead of working with the actual words, we work with their lengths. Since spaces are not to be counted we cannot simply use the previous functions and count lengths of the resulting expressions.

By starting at the top of the triangle below and moving to adjacent numbers on the row below, the maximum total from top to bottom is 23.
3
7 4
2 4 6
8 5 9 3
That is, 3 + 7 + 4 + 9 = 23.
Find the maximum total from top to bottom of the triangle below:
75
95 64
17 47 82
18 35 87 10
20 04 82 47 65
19 01 23 75 03 34
88 02 77 73 07 63 67
99 65 04 28 06 16 70 92
41 41 26 56 83 40 80 70 33
41 48 72 33 47 32 37 16 94 29
53 71 44 65 25 43 91 52 97 51 14
70 11 33 28 77 73 17 78 39 68 17 57
91 71 52 38 17 14 91 43 58 50 27 29 48
63 66 04 68 89 53 67 30 73 16 69 87 40 31
04 62 98 27 23 09 70 98 73 93 38 53 60 04 23
We will represent the triangle as an array of arrays of increasing size.
Consider the second last row of the triangle. In order to maximise the total, we must always
choose a path that takes us to the larger of the two possible values in the last row.
So we can delete the last row, and replace each element in the second last row with the sum of
its value plus the larger of the two below.
This process is carried out by the function squish.
Having done so, we have a new last row and can repeat until the triangle has been reduced to a single value.

You are given the following information, but you may prefer to do some research for yourself.
How many Sundays fell on the first of the month during the twentieth century (1 Jan 1901 to 31 Dec 2000)?
To solve this problem we need to know the number of days in each month for any year from 1901 to 2000.
This is managed by the isleap function combined with the two arrays of month sizes
(days and leapdays). We will keep the last calculated start day in
the global variable dglobal. Given we are told 1 Jan 1900 was a Monday, we can
calculate the first day of 1901 to be Tuesday (dglobal=2).
From this point, we can use the same process to work through all the years from 1901 to 2000
month by month, and calculate how many start days are 0 (i.e. Sunday).
To do this we use the sunstarts function with the start day and days array for one year
passed in as arguments, and returning the number of months found to start on a Sunday.
The dglobal variable is updated using the special global variable access syntax at the
end of the function.

n! means n
(n
1)
...
3
2
1
For example, 10! = 10
9
...
3
2
1 = 3628800,
and the sum of the digits in the number 10! is 3 + 6 + 2 + 8 + 8 + 0 + 0 = 27.
Find the sum of the digits in the number 100!
Simply calculate the factorial, then sum the digits.

Let d(n) be defined as the sum of proper divisors of n (numbers less than n which divide evenly into n).
If d(a) = b and d(b) = a, where a
b, then a and b are an amicable pair and each of a and b are called amicable numbers.
For example, the proper divisors of 220 are 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 11, 20, 22, 44, 55 and 110; therefore d(220) = 284. The proper divisors of 284 are 1, 2, 4, 71 and 142; so d(284) = 220.
Evaluate the sum of all the amicable numbers under 10000.
The amicable function calculates k, the proper sum of the divisors of its argument,
and j, the proper sum of the divisors of k. If this brings us back to the first
number we have an amicable pair, so print the pair and return the value of the argument, else return 0.
To solve the problem, loop and check all values to 10000.

Expand to see all amicable pairs.

Using names.txt (right click and 'Save Link/Target As...'), a 46K text file containing over five-thousand first names, begin by sorting it into alphabetical order. Then working out the alphabetical value for each name, multiply this value by its alphabetical position in the list to obtain a name score.
For example, when the list is sorted into alphabetical order, COLIN, which is worth 3 + 15 + 12 + 9 + 14 = 53, is the
938th name in the list. So, COLIN would obtain a score of 938
53 = 49714.
What is the total of all the name scores in the file?
First we use some file functions to read in the names data from the csv file, and then sort the names array.
The score function both calculates the sum of the letter values of the string argument s
and multiplies by the position in the list p.

A perfect number is a number for which the sum of its proper divisors is exactly equal to the number. For example, the sum of the proper divisors of 28 would be 1 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 14 = 28, which means that 28 is a perfect number.
A number n is called deficient if the sum of its proper divisors is less than n and it is called abundant if this sum exceeds n.
As 12 is the smallest abundant number, 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6 = 16, the smallest number that can be written as the sum of two abundant numbers is 24. By mathematical analysis, it can be shown that all integers greater than 28123 can be written as the sum of two abundant numbers. However, this upper limit cannot be reduced any further by analysis even though it is known that the greatest number that cannot be expressed as the sum of two abundant numbers is less than this limit.
Find the sum of all the positive integers which cannot be written as the sum of two abundant numbers.
In order to test if a number us abundant we define the abund function that takes an explicitly integer argument
(indicated by the % prefix). We then loop through all numbers up to our limit and build up the
array b of abundant numbers. Each element of the array a holds a boolean value that indicates if we
have found an abundant sum for the corresponding integer. Since this can be fairly easily shown to be true for
all even numbers greater than 46, we use the FnFill builtin function to set these values to true ($1).
Next, from the array of abundant numbers we extract the even and odd entries into separate arrays
(the set of even numbers is much larger).
If an odd integer is the sum of two abundant numbers, one must be even and one odd, so using a nested loop we check all
possibilities and update the array a for the sums found.
Since we have already excluded all the even integers greater than 46, we only need to check sums of the smaller even
abundant numbers (the smallest odd abundant number is 945, so we do not need to check the sum of any two odd abundant numbers).
Having completed these calculations it only remains to sum all integers for which a is zero.

A permutation is an ordered arrangement of objects. For example, 3124 is one possible permutation of the digits 1, 2, 3 and 4. If all of the permutations are listed numerically or alphabetically, we call it lexicographic order. The lexicographic permutations of 0, 1 and 2 are:
012 021 102 120 201 210
What is the millionth lexicographic permutation of the digits 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9?
One way to solve this problem is to calculate the number of permutations of a set of digits one
smaller than the number of digits available, and see how many full cycles are completed before passing
a given number. For example, given the 10 digits 0 to 9 and the number one million, the fact that 2 * Fact 9 < 1000000
but 3 * Fact 9 > 1000000 means the initial digit will be a 2. Next, since 100000 - 2 * Fact 9 = 274240
we calculate that 6 * Fact 8 < 274240 but
7 * Fact 8 > 274240, so the next digit is the 6th in the set, i.e. 7 (since the 2 is used already).
This calculation is handled by the function f.
To determine the final result we iterate,
removing the digit found from a and adding it to r each step.

Slower, but much more direct, is to use the builtin function NextPerm.

The Fibonacci sequence is defined by the recurrence relation:
Fn = Fn1 + Fn
2, where F1 = 1 and F2 = 1.
Hence the first 12 terms will be:
F1 = 1
F2 = 1
F3 = 2
F4 = 3
F5 = 5
F6 = 8
F7 = 13
F8 = 21
F9 = 34
F10 = 55
F11 = 89
F12 = 144
The 12th term, F12, is the first term to contain three digits.
What is the first term in the Fibonacci sequence to contain 1000 digits?
Taking the log to base 10 is an easy way to determine number of digits, so we just need to calculate the Fibonacci numbers until we find one with log 1000 or greater.

A unit fraction contains 1 in the numerator. The decimal representation of the unit fractions with denominators 2 to 10 are given:
1/2 = 0.5 1/3 = 0.(3) 1/4 = 0.25 1/5 = 0.2 1/6 = 0.1(6) 1/7 = 0.(142857) 1/8 = 0.125 1/9 = 0.(1) 1/10 = 0.1
Where 0.1(6) means 0.166666..., and has a 1-digit recurring cycle. It can be seen that 1/7 has a 6-digit recurring cycle.
Find the value of d
1000 for which 1/d contains the longest recurring cycle in its decimal fraction part.
The reduce function removes all factors of 2 and 5 from its argument, since in base 10 these
will not contribute to the cycle length.
The cycle length is then given by l where (10 n−1) mod l = 0. This is found
using the len function.
With these two functions in hand, it is just a matter of checking values and finding the maximum.

Euler published the remarkable quadratic formula:
n² + n + 41
It turns out that the formula will produce 40 primes for the consecutive values n = 0 to 39. However, when n = 40, 402 + 40 + 41 = 40(40 + 1) + 41 is divisible by 41, and certainly when n = 41, 41² + 41 + 41 is clearly divisible by 41.
Using computers, the incredible formula n²
79n + 1601 was discovered, which produces 80 primes for the consecutive values n = 0 to 79. The product of the coefficients,
79 and 1601, is
126479.
Considering quadratics of the form:
n² + an + b, where |a|1000 and |b|
1000
where |n| is the modulus/absolute value of n
e.g. |11| = 11 and |4| = 4
Find the product of the coefficients, a and b, for the quadratic expression that produces the maximum number of primes for consecutive values of n, starting with n = 0.
The case n = 0 implies b must be prime, and the case n = 1 implies a must be odd. So loop within these constraints, and save the coefficients which give the maximum length.

Starting with the number 1 and moving to the right in a clockwise direction a 5 by 5 spiral is formed as follows:
21 22 23 24 25
20 7 8 9 10
19 6 1 2 11
18 5 4 3 12
17 16 15 14 13
It can be verified that the sum of the numbers on the diagonals is 101.
What is the sum of the numbers on the diagonals in a 1001 by 1001 spiral formed in the same way?
Ignoring the the central 1, each corner of the ith internal square increases by 2 * i.
The 5 by 5 sample shown contains 2 such squares, and a 1001 by 1001 spiral will contain 500 such squares.
To calculate the required sum, the outer loop in the soution iterates over each square, updating the difference d,
and the inner loop sums the four corners.

Consider all integer combinations of ab for 2
a
5 and 2
b
5:
22=4, 23=8, 24=16, 25=32
32=9, 33=27, 34=81, 35=243
42=16, 43=64, 44=256, 45=1024
52=25, 53=125, 54=625, 55=3125
If they are then placed in numerical order, with any repeats removed, we get the following sequence of 15 distinct terms:
4, 8, 9, 16, 25, 27, 32, 64, 81, 125, 243, 256, 625, 1024, 3125
How many distinct terms are in the sequence generated by ab for 2
a
100 and 2
b
100?
This is another problem that requires nested loops to solve. The expression below will loop over all a
and b and build up an array with the values ab.
Once the array is complete, all that is necessary is to remove duplicates with the Unique builtin function
and then calculate the size.

Surprisingly there are only three numbers that can be written as the sum of fourth powers of their digits:
1634 = 14 + 64 + 34 + 44
8208 = 84 + 24 + 04 + 84
9474 = 94 + 44 + 74 + 44
As 1 = 14 is not a sum it is not included.
The sum of these numbers is 1634 + 8208 + 9474 = 19316.
Find the sum of all the numbers that can be written as the sum of fifth powers of their digits.
The maximum possible value can be determined by finding the point at which the sum of the fifth powers of n digits, each 9, is always less than 10n. Given this maximum, it is simply a matter of evaluating the digit fifth powers for all numbers less than the limit and summing those were the equality holds.

In England the currency is made up of pound, £, and pence, p, and there are eight coins in general circulation:
1p, 2p, 5p, 10p, 20p, 50p, £1 (100p) and £2 (200p).
It is possible to make £2 in the following way:
1£1 + 1
50p + 2
20p + 1
5p + 1
2p + 3
1p
How many different ways can £2 be made using any number of coins?

We shall say that an n-digit number is pandigital if it makes use of all the digits 1 to n exactly once; for example, the 5-digit number, 15234, is 1 through 5 pandigital.
The product 7254 is unusual, as the identity, 39
186 = 7254, containing multiplicand, multiplier, and product is 1 through 9 pandigital.
Find the sum of all products whose multiplicand/multiplier/product identity can be written as a 1 through 9 pandigital.
The most interesting aspect of this solution is the function accept that splits each of
m, n and m*n into their component digits, concatenates these digits into a single
array, removes duplicates, and checks that 9 unique values remain and that 0 is not one of them.
A little bit of analysis reveas that the only possibilities are a 1 digit number times a 4 digit number producing a
4 digit result, or a 2 digit number times a 3 digit number producing a 4 digit result.
Checking all such candidates, the products are saved in the array ns.
The answer is obtained from this array by summing its unique entries.

The fraction 49/98 is a curious fraction, as an inexperienced mathematician in attempting to simplify it may incorrectly believe that 49/98 = 4/8, which is correct, is obtained by cancelling the 9s.
We shall consider fractions like, 30/50 = 3/5, to be trivial examples.
There are exactly four non-trivial examples of this type of fraction, less than one in value, and containing two digits in the numerator and denominator.
If the product of these four fractions is given in its lowest common terms, find the value of the denominator.
Considering a numerator comprised of non-zero digits n1 and n2, and denominator with non-zero digits d1 and d2, the only non-trivial candidates are when n2=d1 or n1=d2. Since the fraction must be less than 1, just need to loop over numerators from 1 to 100 and, for each numerator n, denominators from 1 to 100-n.

145 is a curious number, as 1! + 4! + 5! = 1 + 24 + 120 = 145.
Find the sum of all numbers which are equal to the sum of the factorial of their digits.
Note: as 1! = 1 and 2! = 2 are not sums they are not included.
Similarly to problem 30, we solve to find the maximum possible value by finding the point at which the sum of the factorial sum of n digits, each 9, is always less than 10n. Given this maximum, it is simply a matter of evaluating the factorial sum for all numbers less than the limit and summing those were the equality holds.

The number, 197, is called a circular prime because all rotations of the digits: 197, 971, and 719, are themselves prime.
There are thirteen such primes below 100: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 31, 37, 71, 73, 79, and 97.
How many circular primes are there below one million?
To solve this problem, we need the function rotate to rotate the digits
of an arbitrary integer argument by shifting the last digit to the first position.
Looping through all odd numbers and finding the primes (quickly discarding multiples of 5)
we count how many rotations retain primality. We have a circular prime if all rotations are prime.

The decimal number, 585 = 10010010012 (binary), is palindromic in both bases.
Find the sum of all numbers, less than one million, which are palindromic in base 10 and base 2.
(Please note that the palindromic number, in either base, may not include leading zeros.)
Here we once again need our ispalin function.
The condition in the loop converts the current loop index to a string and a string in base 2,
and returns true if both are palindromes.

The number 3797 has an interesting property. Being prime itself, it is possible to continuously remove digits from left to right, and remain prime at each stage: 3797, 797, 97, and 7. Similarly we can work from right to left: 3797, 379, 37, and 3.
Find the sum of the only eleven primes that are both truncatable from left to right and right to left.
NOTE: 2, 3, 5, and 7 are not considered to be truncatable primes.
Truncating from the right is simply integer division, and the function truncFromR carries this out while
testing primality. Truncating from the left is implemented by splitting out the digits, and recombining from the tail
of the digit array. The function truncFromL implements this logic.
Each of these functions returns 0 if all truncations were prime, so the combined function trunc
performs the necessary check to solve this problem.
Thereafter it is simply a matter of looping and summing.

Take the number 192 and multiply it by each of 1, 2, and 3:
1921 = 192
1922 = 384
1923 = 576
By concatenating each product we get the 1 to 9 pandigital, 192384576. We will call 192384576 the concatenated product of 192 and (1,2,3)
The same can be achieved by starting with 9 and multiplying by 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, giving the pandigital, 918273645, which is the concatenated product of 9 and (1,2,3,4,5).
What is the largest 1 to 9 pandigital 9-digit number that can be formed as the concatenated product of an integer with (1,2, ... , n) where n
1?
The only possible solutions of this problem arise from multiplying a single digit number (the generating number) 5 times, ensuring the multiple of 2 is two digits long. Thus the range of generating numbers for a concatenated product of (1,2,3,4,5) is from 6 to 9.
Similarly we need to consider 3 multiples of a 3 digit number - each 3 digits in length. Thus the range of generating numbers for a concatenated product of (1,2,3) is from 123 to 329 (since all digits must be distinct and the multiple of 3 must remain 3 digits in length).
Finally, we need to consider 2 multiples of a 4 digit number - with the second multiple being 5 digits in length. In this case the range of generating numbers for a concatenated product of (1,2) is from 5123 to 9876 (since all digits must be distinct and the multiple of 3 must remain 3 digits in length).
Using an array and string combine to generate the concatenated products, we check for pandigital results as for problem 32, and sum those that are found.

If p is the perimeter of a right angle triangle with integral length sides, {a,b,c}, there are exactly three solutions for p = 120.
{20,48,52}, {24,45,51}, {30,40,50}
For which value of p
1000, is the number of solutions maximised?
We could re-use some of the problem 9 code to solve this problem, but a more efficient solution is to use the fact that a+b+c=p and a2+b2=c2 implies b=p(p/2-a)/(p-a), for b<a. To solve we simply loop over all candidate values and look for integer values of b.

An irrational decimal fraction is created by concatenating the positive integers:
0.123456789101112131415161718192021...
It can be seen that the 12th digit of the fractional part is 1.
If dn represents the nth digit of the fractional part, find the value of the following expression.
d1
d10
d100
d1000
d10000
d100000
d1000000
The most direct way to solve this problem is to simply generate a string of consecutive numbers that has the required 1 million digits. (From 1 to 200000 is sufficient.) Then we can read the required digits directly and multiply.

A more elegant solution is to calculate explicitly the digit positions where
the values building up the decimal expansion increase in digit length.
The functions sum9 and range perform this calculation.
The following code finds the correct range of values for each digit position of interest,
determines what value encompasses the specific position and how far we need to go into it.
The digits are multiplies as we find them.

We shall say that an n-digit number is pandigital if it makes use of all the digits 1 to n exactly once. For example, 2143 is a 4-digit pandigital and is also prime.
What is the largest n-digit pandigital prime that exists?
Only 1:4 and 1:7 pandigitals are possible, since pandigitals of other sizes are always multiples of 3.
Using the NextPerm standard library function we can examine all possible values,
test their primality and save the maximum.

The nth term of the sequence of triangle numbers is given by, tn = ½n(n+1); so the first ten triangle numbers are:
1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, 55, ...
By converting each letter in a word to a number corresponding to its alphabetical position and adding these values we form a word value. For example, the word value for SKY is 19 + 11 + 25 = 55 = t10. If the word value is a triangle number then we shall call the word a triangle word.
Using words.txt (right click and 'Save Link/Target As...'), a 16K text file containing nearly two-thousand common English words, how many are triangle words?
The solution to this problem is very straightforward, similar to problem 22.

The number, 1406357289, is a 0 to 9 pandigital number because it is made up of each of the digits 0 to 9 in some order, but it also has a rather interesting sub-string divisibility property.
Let d1 be the 1st digit, d2 be the 2nd digit, and so on. In this way, we note the following:
Find the sum of all 0 to 9 pandigital numbers with this property.
The array ps holds the prime divisors, and the function get3 returns the
3 digit number corresponding to the substring at index i.
The function checkdiv takes an array of digits as argument,
builds up the substrings and tests divisibility against each divisor.
If all 7 substrings of a number are divisible by the corresponding prime divisor, add the number to the sum.

Pentagonal numbers are generated by the formula, Pn=n(3n
1)/2. The first ten pentagonal numbers are:
1, 5, 12, 22, 35, 51, 70, 92, 117, 145, ...
It can be seen that P4 + P7 = 22 + 70 = 92 = P8. However, their difference, 70
22 = 48, is not pentagonal.
Find the pair of pentagonal numbers, Pj and Pk, for which their sum and difference is pentagonal and D = |Pk
Pj| is minimised; what is the value of D?
With a function to generate pentagonal numbers and another to check whether a given number is pentagonal, we just need to loop over pentagonal numbers, checking their sum and difference as we go.

Triangle, pentagonal, and hexagonal numbers are generated by the following formulae:
| Triangle | Tn=n(n+1)/2 | 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, ... | ||
| Pentagonal | Pn=n(3n |
1, 5, 12, 22, 35, ... | ||
| Hexagonal | Hn=n(2n |
1, 6, 15, 28, 45, ... |
It can be verified that T285 = P165 = H143 = 40755.
Find the next triangle number that is also pentagonal and hexagonal.
Every hexagonal number is a triangular number, so only need to check hexagonal and pentagonal.
The function hex generates the nth hexagonal number, and the
function ispent checks if its argument is pentagonal.
After finding the trivial solution H1, we step forward and find the example solution H143.
The next solution is the required one: H27693.

It was proposed by Christian Goldbach that every odd composite number can be written as the sum of a prime and twice a square.
9 = 7 + 2
12
15 = 7 + 2
22
21 = 3 + 2
32
25 = 7 + 2
32
27 = 19 + 2
22
33 = 31 + 2
12
It turns out that the conjecture was false.
What is the smallest odd composite that cannot be written as the sum of a prime and twice a square?
For each odd composite number, loop over all candidate 2n2 values, subtracting and checking the remainder for primality. Stop once a number has been found that does not have a prime difference for any 2n2.

The first two consecutive numbers to have two distinct prime factors are:
14 = 2
7
15 = 3
5
The first three consecutive numbers to have three distinct prime factors are:
644 = 2²
7
23
645 = 3
5
43
646 = 2
17
19.
Find the first four consecutive integers to have four distinct primes factors. What is the first of these numbers?
Count unique prime factors with the function nfact, and check adjacent numbers.
Thd first approach does so directly, the second is more extensible — using the array a
to hold the number of distinct prime factors, and the standard function ArrayCmp to check if
each value is greater than 3.

The series, 11 + 22 + 33 + ... + 1010 = 10405071317.
Find the last ten digits of the series, 11 + 22 + 33 + ... + 10001000.
Support for arbitrary precision integer arithmetic makes this trivial to solve. A slightly different approach would be to take the modulus each step rather than just at the finish to reduce memory usage at the slight expense of speed.

The arithmetic sequence, 1487, 4817, 8147, in which each of the terms increases by 3330, is unusual in two ways: (i) each of the three terms are prime, and, (ii) each of the 4-digit numbers are permutations of one another.
There are no arithmetic sequences made up of three 1-, 2-, or 3-digit primes, exhibiting this property, but there is one other 4-digit increasing sequence.
What 12-digit number do you form by concatenating the three terms in this sequence?
Start by calculating and storing all primes below 10000 into the array ps (checking 6n±1
and excluding 2 and 3 since they will not affect the answer).
Using the function perm that returns true if the digits of its two arguments are permutations of each other,
we can solve by building up candidate three value arithmetic series, and checking both permutation and primality.

The prime 41, can be written as the sum of six consecutive primes:
This is the longest sum of consecutive primes that adds to a prime below one-hundred.
The longest sum of consecutive primes below one-thousand that adds to a prime, contains 21 terms, and is equal to 953.
Which prime, below one-million, can be written as the sum of the most consecutive primes?
To solve this it is convenient to precalculate the primes to 1 million,
and then calculate and save the cumulative sums.
Using Gauss's simple prime counting function π(n)≈n / ln n and deliberately overestimating,
we can allocate the prime number array in one step.
Then we fill the prime array (checking 6n±1 as for other solutions),
trim to the found size by excluding all uninitialised values (NaN),
allocate and fill the sums array with the cumulative prime sums,
and define the function add
that returns the sum of primes in a given range.
Then loop and search, checking for the longest sum.
